WebJan 14, 2024 · It is now unlawful for a California employer to require an employee to release FEHA claims in exchange for a raise, bonus, or as a condition of employment or continued … WebIn conclusion, although the FEHA claims may not be barred based on the “exclusive remedy” doctrine, at least in the context of a claim of psychiatric injury in the workers’ …
California Introduces New Restrictions on Employers’ Separation …
WebDec 21, 2024 · For example, the time to file a claim under FEHA is one year from the alleged unlawful conduct. However, this is the deadline to file the administrative complaint with the DFEH, not a civil lawsuit.A party has one year from the issuance of the right-to-sue letter to file a civil lawsuit. To complicate matters further, claims arising under FEHA (a California … WebOct 3, 2024 · This new law prohibits employers from doing either of the following in exchange for a raise or bonus or as a condition of employment or continued employment: … bamp cap
Limits on confidentiality clauses involving harassment claims
WebOct 17, 2024 · Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that workers' FEHA discrimination claims are barred by doctrine of res judicata due to prior allegations made in workers' … WebOct 15, 2024 · SB 1300 also makes it unlawful for an employer to require an employee waive FEHA rights or claims in exchange for a raise or bonus or as a condition of employment unless the release is a voluntary negotiated … WebJan 1, 2024 · Require an employee to sign a release of a claim or right under FEHA; or; For an employer to require an employee to sign a non-disparagement agreement or other … arsenal 08 09